One talk in. A month of faithful content out.

What this does

Studio takes one source — a sermon recording, a conference session, a manuscript chapter — and produces the month of content that would otherwise cost a team most of a week. Social posts, an email, show notes, a blog draft, pull quotes.

Every draft is written from your source, in the author's voice, and then read back against that source before it reaches you. Anything the checker cannot find in the original is flagged, not quietly published.

It does not invent. It does not reach into the model's memory for a fact it likes better. If the line is not in your manuscript, it does not survive the check.

See it work

1. Drop in a source Audio, video, or a document. Studio transcribes it and shows you the transcript first, so you can fix a name or a citation before anything is written from it.
2. Pick what you need Twelve posts and an email. Show notes only. A blog draft. You choose the outputs; you are not handed a fixed bundle.
3. It drafts in the author's voice Written from the source in front of it, not from a generic house style.
4. Every claim goes back to the source A second pass reads the draft against the original and marks anything it cannot support.
5. You approve, then publish Everything arrives as a draft. Nothing leaves without a person saying yes.

Why I built this

Publishers and ministries have the opposite problem to most businesses. They are not short of material — they are short of hands. One conference produces forty hours of teaching that will be heard once and then sit on a hard drive. The bottleneck was never the ideas. It was the week of work between the recording and anything a reader could actually hold.

The tools that already existed would happily write in your author's voice and invent a quotation while doing it. For most businesses that is an annoyance. For a publisher whose entire credibility rests on being accurate about a text, it is disqualifying.

So the check against the source is not a feature bolted on the side. It is the reason the thing exists. Everything else is arrangement.

How it is built

• Runs in your browser Nothing to install, nothing to keep updated. Open a tab and work.
• Claude by Anthropic does the drafting The source-check is a separate pass with a different job, so the model that wrote the line is not the only one grading it.
• Supabase for accounts and storage, Cloudflare in front Your uploads sit in your account, not in a shared pool.
• Stripe for billing Card details never touch a Modulus server.
• A desktop app is on the way For houses with large local libraries that should not leave the building.

Where this breaks

Every tool has an edge. These are Studio's, stated plainly, because you will find them anyway.

• Bad audio ruins everything downstream A phone in a coat pocket makes a poor transcript, and a poor transcript makes poor drafts. Studio shows you the transcript before it writes a word, so you can correct it — but it cannot recover what the microphone never captured.
• It works a chapter at a time, not a whole book at once A 300-page manuscript is processed in sections. That is deliberate: the source-check is only meaningful when the checker can hold the passage in view.
• Voice takes two or three passes to settle on a new author The first batch for a writer Studio has not seen before will read slightly off. Correct it once and it holds.
• It does not replace your editor Everything arrives as a draft, marked as a draft. A tool that told you otherwise would be lying to you.

What this costs

$19, $39, and $99 a month, by volume. Start free with 100 credits — no card, no call, no demo booked three weeks out. If it does not earn its place in the first week, you have lost nothing but an afternoon.

Start free with 100 credits